The Labour Delusion
I’ve noticed recently a couple of people leaving the Green Party and joining Labour. It’s sad to see some people who broadly share my political beliefs make this switch because I think ultimately, for anyone on the left, the Labour Party is a spent force which stopped being anything of worth quite some time ago.
I’ve spoken to people who believe that Labour is the best vehicle to affect change because it is the left-wing party with the biggest membership and most resources.
In theory, this stands to reason, and yet I see no significant breakthroughs for the left in the Labour Party, largely due to its bureaucratic machine, centralising of power, undemocratic nature of its internal elections and weird control-freakery from those at the top (see the fate of Ken Livingstone and Rhodri Morgan in 1999).
Whilst many would agree that the New Labour project was an almost total rejection of many of Labour’s core values which maintained and continued the neo-liberal reform agenda of Thatcher’s Conservatives, are we really to believe that the party under Ed Miliband has changed significantly?
The current Conservative/Lib Dem government is attempting a serious realignment of our welfare state and public sector, seemingly believing that hammering the poorest and most vulnerable in society is preferable to asking the wealthiest to carry some of the load.
It’s grotesque and it’s destroying people’s lives, yet what is Labour’s response?
“My starting point is, I am afraid, we are going to have keep all these cuts.”
Ed Balls, interview with the Guardian, 13th January 2012
The stated policy of the Labour shadow chancellor is that society will be no fairer under Labour.
They won’t reverse the cuts, just as Tony Blair’s government were content to keep Thatcher’s reforms and light-touch banking regulations.
At a time when the most vulnerable in society are under attack from ‘welfare reforms’ which strip away help for cancer patients, adversely affect people suffering from mental illness and demonise the unemployed as scroungers “languishing on the dole”, despite the pitiful job market and large public sector redundancies, how are Labour helping?
The short answer is, of course, that they’re not. Liam Byrne, the shadow secretary of state for work and pensions, wrote an article for the Guardian oozing with the kind of ‘scrounger’ rhetoric which would be more at home in the Daily Mail. He wrote:
[William Beveridge] would have been horrified at the long-term unemployment breaking out all over Britain, with over a million young people without work, and appalled at the spiralling cost of benefits. He would scarcely have believed housing benefit alone is costing the UK over £20bn a year. That is simply too high.
Yet this is attributed to “idleness” according to Byrne, not the disastrous policies of the current and previous governments.
He also fails to recognise that high housing benefits are the result of high rent prices in the private sector, and could be tackled by regulating rents and creating more affordable social housing, not slashing benefits.
Labour seem to think the ‘scrounger’, ‘something for nothing’ rhetoric is such a hit with the right-wing press that it’s surely a vote-winner.
In short, they have capitulated on this, just as they have on cuts, they’ve decided to stick with right-wing consensus and stereotypes about benefit claimants rather than make an alternative argument themselves.
It’s pathetic and it betrays the very people they claim to represent.
If left-wing people who join Labour seek to create change from within and move the party to the left they should look to the evidence of the past.
How did the left-wing of the Labour Party achieve change from within in the build-up to Iraq?
How successful were they in persuading Blair to stop cosying up and selling arms to oppressive Middle-Eastern regimes, or to reconsider his stance on Palestine?
How about forcing a re-think on the UK’s restrictive trade union regulations, or putting a stop to Labour’s love affair with PFI? All of this was when Labour held majorities of 100+ and the main opposition were in disarray.
I could go on. In the end, it’s sad to see people my age with lots of energy and enthusiasm chose to join Labour, because it just seems such a colossal waste of time.
You can attend all the party conferences you like, vote for the left-wing candidates on the NEC and join the LRC, but what do you get out of it in the end?
How do you go about making people’s lives better when your policies are at odds with those of the people who lead the party and wield the power?
Ralph Miliband argued that the socialist heart of the Labour Party was incompatible with parliamentary politics and a capitalist system, and so everything it did would end in compromise.
Since Miliband Sr’s time, the Labour Party has moved even more to the right. It focuses now on following opinion polls rather than making arguments itself.
It cuts down radical voices in its ranks and values those who play the game over those who are democratically elected but don’t tow the party line. I cannot see how any change can come from within, or how joining Labour would result in anything but a watering down of personal principles.
Even if you’re OK with being a part of the party who were involved in mass-murder of civilians in the Middle East and elsewhere, oversaw a crackdown on our civil liberties and the rise of social division and inequality, it’s surely nothing more than the political equivalent of banging your head against a brick wall.
absolutely spot on…I for one would never vote for them again…as I am in wales I am seriously considering joining Plaid Cymru…and going hell for leather for independance…it wont do me any good at my time of life but I have to look to the future for the sake of children and grandchildren..we have 400 years worth of coal in the ground that we could use…we have abundant water supplies….in fact as i look out its bloody raining again….but we do have resources….at least plaid have a social conscience…this bloody shower have none
fair points but things are not quite so simple. the super rich rule the world not governments. a left wing government will never get in. (that is unless many countries of the world act in unison) the UK government can either beg for scraps for its poor and like a cringing dog get away with it (Labour), or join the pomp of high table without a care (Tory). The powerful will not allow poverty to go away. Abject poverty of some acts to ensure that many others, due to fear of it, will work for low wages and unfair conditions, the rich need this to continue.
Having had ME for over forty years and bringing up two children mostly alone I have been poor under an assortment of governments. New Labour were the best of a bad bunch. Tax credits allowed a huge amount of flexibility for example. It was crud yes but not the grinding day to day degradation of the Tories.
who ever gets in will not change much as above the rich in control and will not leave the reigns go lightly.labour not much better than torys and i could not see much of a change with these .we need a clear out of the house and start a gain with some honest people as this lot are either rich or almost there and dont know whot the british public want as they so out of touch with us .jeff3
All of this will end badly. There is sure to be violence, rioting and worse.. While the Tory Councils attempt to force families and single-people out of London into worse areas of unemployment in the Midlands and North of England, the backlash will be that unrest and civil disobedience reaches epidemic proportion. No amount of Police or other additional Private Sector Police will do anything more than inflame things further. The Labour Party will be eviscerated and the result will be something more malevolent and equally ‘autocratic.’ The truth is, we are faced with a watershed moment. We need to face the facts, that if we want to show our opposition, not only to the wretched Coalition Policies that are ruining us and the Nation’s Economy – but to the Political Ideology ALL the Political Parties appear to be following – we have to decide who, and how, to fight? Taking the fight to the streets might seem reasonable; but we also have to have a strategy to fight the Political Parties ‘propaganda machine.’ Perhaps a web-wide campaign to bring this nasty little administration to its knees might be better considered – rather than merely having a stand-off with Police etc.. Perhaps the Occupy Lobby could actually ‘occupy’ somewhere of significance that was more public, more intrusive and more prone to being publicized by ALL the News Media and Papers. Perhaps we must consider methods that, in ordinary circumstances, might seem unorthodox and unexpected. I firmly believe that this Nation is, at present, merely ‘toying’ with real Nazism. I believe that it is engaged in a ‘testing’ period – to see how far people are willing to allow Government to go. It is not yet too late to mount the kind of pressure we need to force others to step back from the brink: for if the Tories, Lib-Dems and the Labour Party form a ‘triage’ of powers with similar outward Political Ideologies – we will be facing a monster that we must eithe rface and destroy – or it WILL destroy us. Remember: these are parties who are now blaming the poorest, most disabled, infirm or sick for their own conditions. The Christian ‘values’ they ALL profess to have are mere window-dressing for an underlying intolerance and bigotry which is hard-wired into their collective ‘consciousness.’ At the risk of sounding like a ‘revolutionary’ – whatever we must do, must be done together and to the utmost!
‘Slay or be slain!’
Yes indeed, would not waste my time being part of a Tory wet party. Vote for labour for more of the same. We need a NEW third party, not the trash that currently masquerade as politicians. Socialism is not a dirty word and its time has come, in the end there will be no choice, for its either a radical change or Nazism. That is the direction this government is heading and the Labour party are doing nothing to stop it, so to cut a long story short they are complicit in the nations suffering and ultimately are not worthy of the word ‘ opposition’ when they are more like simpering dogs.