“If you are entitled to it, you’re not a scrounger. If you don’t have enough food, or difficulty heating your home, don’t let the “Lord Snooties” make you think it’s criminal to find out what help you’re entitled to.

Don’t be one of the 1.8 million victims of disinformation from the likes of the Daily Mail.”


The content previously published here has been withdrawn. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Category
Tags

7 Responses

  1. This is not news

    The Guardian is avehicle of the propaganda machine and has done its bit toward villification of the poor

    The DWP is a vile organisation headed by fascists and nazis

  2. This is the kind of media bias that the Leveson Inquiry should have been tackling, but I guess will barely hint at. The disproportionate and shameless vilification of poor and disabled people, and those without jobs by both media and government should be classed as irresponsible. Instead it gets lapped up by the haters, who have now come to be the people who define ‘public opinion’. This is what happens when the media will only print/publish what is in the interests of their advertisers. So much for a free press.

  3. Time for some cuts for politicians.

    I propose that from April 1st the expenses system should end.
    Politicians will use their own wages to buy or rent living accomodation, they will pay for their transport costs like everyone else in the country out of their own pocket. Their will be no free heating, food or drink.
    All bars within the proximity of the Houses of Parliament will be closed, the tax payer refuses to bear the cost.

    Any complaints will be dealt with the standard retort: No exceptions, these cuts are necessary to reduce the deficit.

    Every politician seeking election will need to show proof of either a masters degree in economics or accountancy, againno exceptions entertained.

    Atos will be seconded from the DWP to look at and investigate the last thirty years of politicians expenses. It will be up to our dishonourable MP’s to prove that they are innocent. They will be assumed to be guilty until proven innocent.

    Humanity you are almost correct, I would use the term parasites

  4. does anyone know what rule 69 is. and how people in suits at medical appeals have the rite to say someone does not have a disability and they can clearly see that they are in pain and struggle to walk.

Leave a Reply

Help support our work
Donate

One way you can help is to make a much valued Donation to Black Triangle through PayPal.

Got a news story relating to disability? Contact –


The News Service that focuses on disability issues such as discrimination, equality, independent living, disability benefits, poverty and human rights.

If you have a story that you think would be of interest to Disability News Service please contact John Pring via

john@disabilitynewsservice.com

Donate

One way you can help is to make a much valued Donation to Black Triangle through PayPal.

e-petition - Stop Unfair Re-assessments For Disabled People

Responsible department: Department for Work and Pensions

Stop the unfair and cruel re-assessments via ATOS for disabled people currently on Incapacity Benefit. ESA is a flawed benefit, and puts terrible pressure and stress on vulnerable people, putting people who cannot work on lesser benefits and applying sanctions. Let disabled people decide for themselves if they can work, they and their carers know best.

Click HERE to Sign

Called in for an ESA by Atos? You are not alone, join DWPExaminations Forum

 
For Help, Advice & Support