Music Video: “Black-Pink-Red-Green Yellow Triangle I DID NOT SPEAK” ~ Christie Moore


 After the words attributed to: Pastor Martin Niemöller 

Martin Niemoller
Martin Niemoller

Thousands of sick or disabled people have died after undergoing assessments to find out whether they were fit to work, the House of Commons was told today. Posted on January 17, 2013

Michael Meacher MP

As knowledge of the debate has spread, I have been sent nearly 300 case histories, many of which make heart-rending reading.

I cannot begin to do justice to their feelings of distress, indignation, fear, helplessness and, indeed, widespread anger at the way they have been treated.

Nor can I easily contain my own feelings at the slowness, rigidity and insensitivity with which Atos and the Department for Work and Pensions have responded—or very often not responded—to the cries of pain that they have heard repeatedly.

I have time to cite briefly only three examples which show how extreme is the dysfunction and malfunctioning of the Atos assessments.

The first example concerns a constituent of mine who was epileptic almost from birth and was subject to grand mal seizures.

At the age of 24, he was called in by Atos, classified as fit for work and had his benefit cut by £70 a week. He appealed, but became agitated and depressed and lost weight, fearing that he could not pay his rent or buy food.

Three months later, he had a major seizure that killed him.

A month after he died, the DWP rang his parents to say that it had made a mistake and his benefit was being restored.

The second example, also from the Oldham area, concerns a middle-aged woman who was registered blind and in an advanced stage of retinitis pigmentosa.

She was assessed at 9 points—well short of the 15 that are needed—and her incapacity benefit was withdrawn.

On review by a tribunal, the Atos rating of 9 points was increased to 24.

The third case—I could have chosen from hundreds of others—also comes from the north-west and concerns an insulin-dependent diabetic with squamous cell cancer, Hughes syndrome, which involves a failed immune system, peripheral neuropathy, which meant that he had no feeling in his feet or legs, heart disease, depression and anxiety.

Despite his life-threatening condition, he was placed in the work-related activity group.

Those and myriad other examples illustrate incontrovertibly that Atos’s current work capability assessment system is drastically flawed, and for several reasons.

First, Atos is an IT firm and it uses the so-called Logic Integrated Medical Assessment, which is often described as “rigid” and “tick-box” because computer-based systems make it difficult for health professionals to exercise their professional judgment.

Because such a mechanistic system has little or no regard for the complexity of the needs of severely disabled or sick persons, the British Medical Association and others have condemned the current WCA as “not fit for purpose”.

Secondly, assessed persons regularly felt that the opinion of their own doctor or of other specialist medical personnel who were treating them was either ignored or overridden.

That is all the more serious when Atos’s practices simply do not adhere to the guidance for doctors set down by the General Medical Council.

Thirdly, because of the failure of so many initial assessments, the appeal procedure is grossly overloaded and hugely expensive. No less than 41% of decisions are appealed, of which 38% are won. At £60 million in a single year, the appeals have cost the taxpayer more than half of the £110 million that was spent on the original assessments. Moreover, the National Audit Office has castigated the Department for failing to penalise Atos for what it politely calls its “underperformance” and for not setting “sufficiently challenging” targets.

Fourthly, there are concerns about the responsibility for work capability assessments, in particular that of the Atos chief medical officer.

Professor Michael O’Donnell joined Atos from the American company, Unum, formerly UnumProvident, which had a very poor reputation in the US, where it was described as an “outlaw company” by the US authorities, partly because it was regarded as a “disability denial factory”. In that situation, the responsibilities of the Minister and the Secretary of State need to be established clearly.

Against that background, it is frankly not good enough for the Minister to respond to the debate by saying that there have been three Harrington reviews, and that the Department is doing the best it can to improve procedures.

The fundamental issue is this: how can pursuing with such insensitive rigour 1.6 million claimants on incapacity benefit, at a rate of 11,000 assessments every week, be justified when it has led, according to the Government’s own figures, to 1,300 persons dying after being put into the work-related activity group, 2,200 people dying before their assessment is complete, and 7,100 people dying after being put into the support group?

Is it reasonable to pressurise seriously disabled persons into work so ruthlessly when there are 2.5 million unemployed, and when on average eight persons chase every vacancy, unless they are provided with the active and extensive support they obviously need to get and hold down work, which is certainly not the case currently?

I therefore want to conclude by asking the Minister five specific questions to which I want a specific answer before the end of the debate.

First, it is true that Harrington has produced minor adjustments—implemented at a glacial place—but the underlying system remains largely undisturbed. The BMA and the NAO have therefore called for a thorough, rigorous and transparently independent assessment of the suitability of the work capability assessment. Will the Minister now implement that?

Secondly, will the Minister accept that the current criteria and descriptors do not sufficiently—or even at all—take into account fluctuating conditions, especially episodic mental health problems? How will he rectify that?

Thirdly, will the Minister provide full and transparent details of the Atos contract? They should not be hidden by specious claims of commercial confidentiality when Atos is the sole provider of what is clearly a public service. Better still, given that Atos has failed so dramatically, why does he not in-source the work back into the NHS?

Fourthly, how will the Minister ensure that the medical expertise of disabled persons’ doctors and related professionals is fully taken into account before assessments are completed?

Lastly, I want to provide a full dossier to the Secretary of State so that he fully understands what is being done today in his name, and to bring a small delegation to see him from some of the excellent organisations of disabled people who have heroically battled to highlight and tackle the distress and pain caused by Atos.

Can I please be assured that the Secretary of State will see such a delegation?

I repeat that I am sincerely grateful for this debate, for the co-operation of colleagues from all parties, and for the detailed responses I have received from so many hundreds of victims of Atos, but I assure the Minister of this: the debate is important, but it will certainly not be the end of the matter.






10 thoughts on “Music Video: “Black-Pink-Red-Green Yellow Triangle I DID NOT SPEAK” ~ Christie Moore

  1. kaydee says:

    Those words are so powerful when read or spoken but hearing it sung gave me a chill I can’t describe.

  2. Humanity2012 says:

    National Socialist Regime Germany and Con Dem Regime UK There is a Simularity
    Namely the Victimisation of the Poor and Vulnerable and the Masses Sheepishly
    Colluding by Not Opposing

  3. Christopher says:

    The following is one version of his quotation;

    (( First they came for the communists,
    and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.

    Then they came for the socialists,
    and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a socialist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists,
    and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews,
    and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.

    Then they came for the Catholics,
    and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Catholic.

    Then they came for me,
    and there was no one left to speak for me.))

    next they came for the disabled……….

    1. Brian F Kirkham says:

      God help me then Christopher – As i’m disabled AND a Catholic….

      Perhaps the Revolation John Talks of at the end of the Gospels is coming to fruition.

      Why? I hear you ask? Quite simple – Despite A Mountain of Medical Evidence to the contrary and absolutely NOBODY coming to actually Physically assess me

      Dear Old ATOS have deemed me FIT FOR WORK!!!

      (Yes, I Know i can appeal – but it’s going to be much more fun signing at the jobcentre, knowing that the jobcentre knows their service has messed up)

      Don’t know if it’s the medication i’m on Kicking in – Or the Madness of my Situation : but I’m Actually LOOKING FORWARD TO IT!!!! (Call the Shrink Now – It’s only going to get worse over the next few days)

      I’ll enjoy watching the circus – as the jobcentre staff try their worst (and i do mean that) to attempt to get me back into work (That music you’re hearing – the tune to Mission Impossible…without help, its going to get louder – Trust me!)

      and when the time comes..and the same excuses come rolling out of JCP’ll hear me laughing from a hundred miles away.

      Time for a prayer for the Hapless at JCP to St Jude me thinks…
      (for those not in the know – St Jude is the Patron Saint of HOPELESS CAUSES!)

      1. Brian F Kirkham says:

        I’ve got to “Report” to My local jobcentre plus office at the end of this week. Can’t wait to see the officers who signed me off – they’re going to have a load of explaining to do!

  4. K Peake says:

    What a beautiful voice.

    Thank God Almighty for capable, discerning politicians like Michael Meacher MP.

    73 of us dying each week of Atos (DWP)

    No record of the 43% of us found fit for work who aren’t working or receiving benefits the following year which will mean nothing to the gangster squad but be of terrible concern to anyone with a beating heart

    494 of us dying each week of cold

    1 in 500 of us currently being kept alive by responsible taxpayers at foodbanks leaping impressively to 1 in 250 of us by April

    The blame for these deaths lies squarely with the terrorists who launched this vicious and cowardly attack.

    Sign this petition to show the gangster squad what happens when they defame, illegitimise and abandon disabled people:

  5. Brian F Kirkham says:

    Well Folks! I’ve attended the Jobcentre – and i’m more confused than EVER.

    The meeting was to discuss my “Options” for work (felt like i were 13 again!)

    I actually saw the officer (who had avoided me for 4 weeks) , Read my previous notes…listen to me and my dad (who went with me for support) found out what i’ve been doing and then…announce to us both….

    I’m On ESA (Confusing – Given I had a Letter to the Contrary)

    Does this mean i’ve got a Medical coming my way?

    I’ll have to report back to the Jobcentre when they send for me again….

Leave a Reply