(If anyone knows Jon – make sure he reads this – he deserves a right to reply before we take our political campaigning against Neoliberal Labour up a few notches. Thanks)
So John Cruddas is goint to be knocking on the doors of Tony Blair, Miliband Snr and James-bloody-Purnell is he? How on earth do politicians convincingly spraff one thing while doing the complete opposite, completely hoodwinking everyone else in the process?
Remember Blair in 1995? Clegg mania in 2010? Wow! What a good spiel they talked! And we all fell for it. Fool me once, shame on you…..
We want to know, why is Purnell, who was the architect of the welfare ‘reform’ crackdown that continues to crush hundreds of thousands of innocent sick and/or disabled people being brought back? A man so reviled and vain that even to mention his name in self-respecting, left-wing circles is enough to make people apoplectic with rage?
And Blair? He is hated and reviled as a war criminal, a deceiver and as a man who puts his own financial interests and those of JP Morgan above any other ethical principle. A man like Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs who is so thoroughly self-delusional that he honestly believes that by serving the interests of the neoliberal investment banking élites – those who are fast destroying our world and making hundreds of millions destitute – he is actually doing ‘God’s work’?
Gimme a break!
Oh – yes, and Miliandroid Snr, the ‘Heir to Blair’ – a man so hungry for power he would sell his granny to get into No. 10 if he still had one. Ruthlessly calculating, ambitious, organised and self-disciplined. Allegedly implicated in extraordinary rendition and complicity in torture during his ‘serving’ as The Boy Foreign Secretary. There was supposed to be a judicial inquiry into this, but it all seems to have been “swept under the carpet” for now, to the best of our knowledge,
In the context of all this, the following speech would seem to be a sop to keep the left placid and acquiescent.
Forgive us if we don’t buy it.
The keeping of Liam Byrne as Shadow DWP/IDS and the arrogant refusal by Stephen Timms Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary/Chris Grayling to accept the entire body of UK medical – and ethical – opinion expressed unanimously by Britain’s General Practitioners that the Work Capability Assessment must be ended with immediate effect – these testify against you.
If anything, this policy review very much looks like it has resulted in another coup for the right. What evidence have you to show us in the alternative?
If the three pillars of a good life are “Learning,Prayer, Good Deeds” as someone once said, we have this to say to Mr. Cruddas – a self-confessed ‘man of faith’: Concentrate on the latter, Jon, because knowledge and fine words do not save or sustain lives or deliver social and economic justice.
Yes, Jon. Where is the compassion? Where has the integrity gone?
Your actions will be weighed in the balance, and you will be judged BY US accordingly.
Fool us twice….shame on us!
We’re not up for anymore shame, Cruddas. We’ll outflank you by all and any means at our disposal. You might laugh at us now, and see this as an empty threat, but we will prove to be a formidable political enemy if your party continues to remain complicit in our oppression.
We owe no loyalty to you or any other party. We are only loyal to our friends and to each other.
Continue opposing our movement, and you’ll be looking at ‘upheaval’ alright.
Jon Cruddas MP‘s speech to the Compass annual conference on 12th June 2010
‘How Labour needs to reinvent itself’
Its been a cracking day. Vibrant. Open. Optimistic.
In contrast to a sour right wing noise around Labour since the election. That goes something like this: We lost the vote of those working class people. So lets prioritise the ‘indigenous folk’, hit those newly arrived and get stuck into the welfare mothers swinging the lead, hoovering up benefits.
Raymond Williams once said that ‘to be truly radical is to make hope possible rather than despair convincing’. We should remember that.
For sure, Labour was the biggest loser on May 6th. Yet the result reflected a wider failure of the political class to present a convincing vision of post-crisis Britain.
For all the hype the “liberal moment” failed to materialise. The Conservatives enjoyed an unpopular government, a partisan Tory press, a huge funding advantage and a tax revolt by the business elite.
Yet Cameron got just 36% of the vote. In an election without winners, as people were looking for a choice that wasn’t there.
But our failure was all the greater because we should have known better. Labour at its best is the party of radical hope.
Yet were too implicated in the crisis to seize the moment. We were told to be “intensely relaxed about people becoming filthy rich”.
Indeed, we became so relaxed that we slipped into a moral and intellectual coma. We cannot understand the resounding defeat unless we accept it as a verdict on ourselves.
Yet even now there are many who refuse to face up to what has happened; people who feel that the result wasn’t so bad. That not much needs to change; we wait for the coalition to implode and sweep back into office. The politics of safety first, one more heave and business as usual.
It is a route map into the wilderness. This New Orthodoxy appears willing to camp out on the right flank of the coalition- witness the hits on the vulnerable.
An ex minister wrote last week of how we needed to ‘crack down on the welfare underclass’. Others argue for us to become the ‘anti immigration party’. A new kiss up, kick down politics that blames the victim.
There lies political death for labour.
No language, no warmth no kindness; no generosity, vitality nor optimism. No compassion. If you seek to outflank the coalition from the right, you will turn Labour into a byword for intolerance. But worse, you will fly in the face of what the public well knows – about who needs to pick up the tab for the crisis.
There’s something absurd – there’s no other word – about coming out of the crash and picking not on Bob Diamond, or Fred The Shred, or Philip Green, but people on welfare and struggling migrants.
If Labour becomes the voice for this sour, shrill hopeless politics it will die. And it will deserve to.
Think for a moment of this quote:
Yes, we’ve made progress, but let’s not kid ourselves. There’s a way to go before we can return to government. There’s a lot we need to do in this party of ours. Our base is too narrow and so, occasionally, are our sympathies, You know what some people call us: the nasty party.
Now I am no great fan of Theresa May but today this sounds strangely appropriate. Sure, the four ex-Cabinet Ministers now running for the Labour leadership all agree that it’s time to bury New Labour. Yet none has so far made a profound break with the assumptions and practices that defined it at the end.
Far be it from me to compare modern politicians to Soviet apparatchiks, but we will not recover by adopting the mentality of Soviet Politburo in the late 1950s for whom reform meant little more than denouncing Stalin while keeping the policies and structures of Stalinism intact.
The Soviet Union endured thirty years of stagnation before the arrival of glasnost. Lets try and speed it up a bit.
The deep renewal Labour now needs to undertake should include three interlocking elements.
The first is a root and branch policy review. Nothing should be considered sacrosanct. That was the approach we took after the 1987 general election. If anything, the scale of our defeat and the task ahead is even greater now than then.
But in reality- and lets be honest- it is not really about individual policies. It is not just about housing, agency workers, immigration, the 10p tax level- these were the debates and arguments of 3 or 4 years ago. Today the task is more profound. The policy errors were the result of a corruption in an underlying value system. As a party, we seemed to have lost our way.
So side by side with a policy review, Labour needs to undergo a profound Cultural Reformation. We need to re-examine our entire way of doing things.
We do not do that by denying our past, but by drawing inspiration from it. That is what a reformation means. Many are deeply alienated by the culture of Labourism in both its old and new variants. If we are to be part of a new progressive alliance, we have to earn that right, not merely assert it.
We must reach out by showing that we can change to become more open, democratic and pluralistic. And this cultural reformation is the root into rebuilding a new Labour Covenant with the electorate.
And this is the third and most critical element of real renewal. It begins in England as an exercise in self discovery.
We lost the election in England, badly. It is in England that our future will be determined. Let us begin by reminding ourselves who we are.
We are Labour and we are not new. Our roots are centuries deep in the struggle for democracy and justice. We are the light shining in Buckinghamshire. With Rainsborough at Putney. The Levellers Charter was ours. Standing with the crowd at Peterloo. Standing with the Irishman Bronterre O’Brien and William Cuffay.
The People’s Charter was ours. John Ruskin’s rallying cry is our creed – ‘there is no wealth but life’. Standing alongside match girls; dockers; miners. With railway workers at Taff Vale.
With the Men’s Political Union and the Suffragettes.
This is Labour’s gift to us all today.
And in turn Labour’s future is our obligation. Make it once more the defender of society against the power of the state and the market. Organise the powerless. Give voice to the voiceless.
A new covenant with the people of England and with the nations of Britain. Built on identity and nationhood; neighbourliness and belonging; kindness and solidarity; duty and obligation. Critically it is a politics located in and respectful of the ordinary. At its best this is precisely what New Labour sought and achieved.
Tony Blair argued in 1994 for a new nationalism:
A new spirit in the nation based on working together, unity, solidarity, partnership. This is the patriotism of the future. Where your child in distress is my child, your parent ill and in pain is my parent, your friend unemployed or homeless is my friend; your neighbour my neighbour. That is the true patriotism of a nation.
So what went wrong? Well we broke this covenant with the people.
Contrast the Blair of 1994 with that at the 2005 Labour Party Conference.
Here he described how, quote “the character of this changing world is indifferent to tradition. Unforgiving of frailty. No respecter of past reputations. It has no custom and practice.”
I say this is nonsense. Rather than view this world as destructive and dehumanising, he celebrated those who are quote ‘swift to adapt’ and, ‘open, willing and able to change’. He celebrates a set of attributes available to an elite.
It gives no voice to the voiceless. The distance between these two speeches reflects the emptying of Labour government.
By 2005 what worked, for him, is quote a “liberal economy, prepared constantly to change to remain competitive.”
It is a dystopian ‘winner takes all’ vision of capitalist modernity in which the human values of commitment, fidelity and loyalty are subordinated to anonymous and unpredictable market forces.
It’s ‘creative destruction’ destroys ethical values, social cohesion, and cultural identity. This worldview is a major factor in the collapse of Labour’s support.
Our loss of language. Our lost our soul. Something relished by the sour secularist.
In a way that mirrors Hayek’s liberalism, New Labour’s utilitarianism cultivated an acquisitive, selfish individualism cut loose from social obligations. We kiss up and we kick down. Where is the compassion? The door was then opened for David Cameron’s Compassionate Conservatism as Labour lost its language, its hope and optimism.
Carry this on to today and it is logical that we blame the victim- the migrant or welfare recipient.
Richard Rorty once wrote that ‘the best way to cause people long-lasting pain is to humiliate them by making the things that seemed most important to them look futile, obsolete and powerless’.
This is what many feel when thinking of the journey from 94 to 2005. Real pain and loss – because the very optimism of progressive politics appears to have been lost from a party, that, at its best, was a byword for it.
Labour has to win back this political terrain. It is a language not a branding exercise.
It incorporates all the things that Blair’s later speech dismisses as anachronistic: tradition, the valuing of settled ways of life; an identification and pleasure in local place and belonging; a desire for home and rootedness; the continuity of relationships at work and in one’s neighbourhood.
It is in short the quest of building a new Covenant with the people.
First, it is a covenant of reciprocity: ‘of doing unto others as you would have them do unto you’. People give to others – as good citizens, workers, neighbours and parents. In return they are given a fair and just tax system, universal social protection, a minimum income entitlement.
A living wage, secure employment and pensions. Homes for people to live in.
Second, the covenant is for an ethical economy, organised for human well being and equality. That means reform of the banks. Securing capital and employment in localities. Reform of corporate governance to make business accountable.
Third, the covenant is for liberty. Strong democratic cultures for active participation and deliberative decision-making. Freedom of information, and a plural media ownership. Civil liberties cherished, not given away cheaply. Now a new covenant will not work top-down.
An undemocratic party unreformed will destroy it. Tribalism will wither it. What is victory in the next election if it is only power that we seek?
So let’s give heart to future generations. Let them look back on our time and wish that they too had been here.
That they had played a part in the great revival of Labour and in the struggle for a good society. Because the next few years will see profound economic rupture and social upheaval.
We must resist the Lib Cons, defend services and communities. This will possibly the most challenging period for at least a generation. The fundamental political terrain will divide between hope and despair; optimism and cynicism. We know where Compass will stand- but where will Labour end up?
For Labour to be part of the solution it must rediscover a rich English tradition of volatile, inspirational cultures of non-conformity, rebelliousness and creativity. The task at hand is quite simple: to make hope possible rather than despair convincing.
Literally by rediscovering a sense of purpose for a nation.
Speech given by Jon Cruddas at the Compass conference in London on 12th June 2010
6 thoughts on “Labour Policy Chief Jon Cruddas’s ‘Greatest Speech’ ~ a man of integrity, or a tool of the Right and a sop to the Left?”
at last a voice another one who can see whot is going to happen ,if tony blair is brought back to help out (least you forget atos unum } we be poorer again as this lot havent a care for anyone but themselves and the general public once you voted them in can wave goodbye to self esteem you thought they would bring,bring nothing but more heart ache so ed please keep them out jeff3
Just who do we trust ?,because all the Parties seem to want to get rid of the sick and disabled.
If only John Smith hadn’t died in the 90’s. Labour might still be Labour. I wa nt to desert the Labour party and vote for Plaid Cymru in the next election, but am worried this might bolster the Cons. Difficult one.
Sadly , the involvement of Blair and other neo-liberals will simply resign Labour to further years in the wilderness, and will see this government works towards their ‘ final solution’.
There are over 10 million disabled people in the uk, as I told my mini-brained Con. MP recently-that’s a lot of votes. Politicians need to hear this loud and clear- that we can make them or break them. How to get the message across?
Well Do Not Vote for Any of Them as they are too Arrogant to Listen
Demand Constitutional Protection for the Welfare of the Poor and Vulnerable
to be Honoured by all UK Governments or Instant Dismissal from Office
Boycott All ” Newspapers ” that have been Victimising the Poor and Vulnerable
Speak to be Heard and if it ” Offends ” the None so Blind as those who will Not See
that So be It
Justice and Human Rights are More Important than Arrogant Millionaire Politicians
and Bigoted Newspapers and the Ignorant Bigots who Read Them and Believe their