HomeAtosAtos nurse struck off over PIP assessment lies
Comments
  • Terminator August 11, 2016 at 4:17 pm

    I hope all those who she found not to qualify for the benefit are compensated and I do mean large payments not the measly £50 to £100 they normally give as compensation I mean thousands per claimant plus all back pay to the date of the original assessment and that money should come from ATOS and the DWP in equal amounts as the DWP are all too willing to believe the lies of their third party rather than the Person that was due an assessment. This was not the odd one but seems to have been many that she called, that’s one reason I never put any contact numbers on the forms I send them.

  • piddledoff August 21, 2016 at 11:30 pm

    Nurses are registered.It is their job to carry out accurate assessments.
    No matter what setting they work in,if you think they have been less than professional,you have the right to report them,and even have them struck off.Its your duty.Perhaps they are employing nurses that no one else would.

  • piddledoff August 21, 2016 at 11:37 pm

    A DWP spokeswoman said: “We expect the highest standards from the contractors who carry out assessments on our behalf and this behaviour is in no way tolerated by DWP. Do we really believe this?
    Now she has been struck off the nursing register by a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) panel, which found her guilty of misconduct.Should be more of them going then.These people who carry out assessments,should wear a name badge.Perhaps we should be asked to fill in a client satisfaction form,post assessment result.Its only fair,don,t you think?

  • beltane September 12, 2016 at 7:28 pm

    It seems strange that when I tried complain about the way in which my interview/assessment was conducted they said it was a matter between me and the company they were not interested. I called the company who said they would send me a complaints form ,what I received was an information card about what to expect during the assessment. They tried to insinuate that I got it wrong or had bad memory. I replied that if that was the case why had they stated in the report I had no memory problems??? Then came the “your version of the facts” I replied that there is no such thing as a version of facts FACTS are constant so please don’t mess with the English language I HAVE DESPITE THIS SENT A FULL COMPLAINT OF THE DISCREPANCYS AND OUTRIGHT FALSE HOODS IN THE REPORT to both DWP and ATHOS and await the result If they ail to respond I will try for a judicial revue of the procedure I may be broke and physically disabled BUT I AM GOING TO BE HEARD AND DEMAND THE TO BE TREATED WITH RESPECT

  • You must be logged in to comment. Log in
%d bloggers like this: